Journal cover Journal topic
Drinking Water Engineering and Science An interactive open-access journal

Journal metrics

  • CiteScore<br/> value: 0.79 CiteScore
    0.79
  • SNIP value: 0.813 SNIP 0.813
  • SJR value: 0.228 SJR 0.228
  • IPP value: 0.719 IPP 0.719
doi:10.5194/dwesd-6-1-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
 
29 Jan 2013
Review status
This discussion paper has been under review for the journal Drinking Water Engineering and Science (DWES). The revised manuscript was not accepted.
Cost and impact analysis of preventive and remedial measures for safe drinking water
M. A. Tahir1 and H. Rasheed2 1National Water Quality Laboratory, Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Kheyaban-e-Johar, H-8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan
2Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Kheyaban-e-Johar, H-8/1, Islamabad, Pakistan
Abstract. Preventive measures yield much higher cost effective benefits as compared to remedial measures. To verify this hypothesis, a survey was conducted in two different regions of Rawalpindi district of Pakistan by comparing the cost on medication and mitigation expenditures for reduction in the burden of water borne diseases. Water Quality monitoring of the study areas in comparison to WHO Drinking Water Guidelines revealed the satisfactory level of physico-chemical parameters, however; significant bacteriological contamination was found at 86% of the monitored sites in Gujar Khan and 87% in Murree region. A field questionnaire was used to estimate the expenditures on disinfection and sanitation and concluded that 8.09% of total income of each family were spent by the inhabitants of the study area on medication for water borne diseases. Correlation was worked out between the rate of water related diseases (VWRD), unsafe drinking water (CDW), poor sanitation (PS), unhealthy personal hygiene and environment (UHPHE). A simulation model "Victim's Rate Calculator" was developed to forecast the estimated number of victims within a population. Findings of the study verified the hypothesis that preventive measures are better choice than remedial measures due to cost benefit ratio (1 : 1.6) with a clear advantage of 60%.

Citation: Tahir, M. A. and Rasheed, H.: Cost and impact analysis of preventive and remedial measures for safe drinking water, Drink. Water Eng. Sci. Discuss., 6, 1-26, doi:10.5194/dwesd-6-1-2013, 2013.
M. A. Tahir and H. Rasheed
Interactive discussionStatus: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version      Supplement - Supplement
 
RC C9: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Apr 2013 Printer-friendly Version 
 
AC C87: 'Response to Interactive comment on “Cost and impact analysis of preventive and remedial measures for safe drinking water', mUHAMMAD Muhammad Aslam Tahir, 10 Sep 2013 Printer-friendly Version 
M. A. Tahir and H. Rasheed
M. A. Tahir and H. Rasheed

Viewed

Total article views: 1,064 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
483 544 37 1,064 39 25

Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Saved

Discussed

Latest update: 25 May 2017
Publications Copernicus
Download
Share